New Energy and Environment Digest 新能源与环保参考

China’s Emissions Trading Plan Puts Weight on Countries’ Cumulative GHG

Posted in Climate change, Environmental Policies, International Agreements, Politics by ebalkan on March 30, 2009

chinaearthChina appears to be backing out of global efforts to address climate change, intensifying pre-Copenhagen debate.

A top China central government think tank yesterday released a framework for quantifying countries’ historical emissions. Under this proposed framework, the State Council Development Research Center (DRC) would create a “historic account” of past emissions, used to benchmark developing countries with lower accumulated emissions – like China – against countries with higher accumulated emissions and assign emissions “deficits” to countries who have emitted less. Using this quantitative assessment, countries with emissions “deficits” would get the green light to emit, or trade emissions credits with countries that have already exceeded their allowance.

The release of this plan supports external analysis that China believes it should have the right to develop free from carbon reductions until their accumulated emissions are on par with industrialized countries. A recent Brookings Institute report: “Overcoming Obstacles to US-China Cooperation on Climate Change” articulated Beijing’s stance, which included the conviction that:

Countries should be held responsible not only for their current emissions but also for their cumulative historical emissions, given that greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere over many decades.

This plan is Beijing’s most comprehensive effort to date to both highlight and quantify development inequalities as a justification for releasing China and other developing countries from emissions reduction expectations.

While this proposal does not represent official policy, the fact that the think tank comes directly under China’s policy making apparatus, the State Council, suggests consonance with the party line. As such, the new plan further indicates Beijing’s uncooperative position on climate negotiation; suggesting that breaking the carbon deadlock in Copenhagen may be even more difficult than stakeholders anticipate.

This news also builds on, and comes just days after, talks between climate envoys from the EU, China, Japan and the Obama administration in Washington. During those discussions, China’s senior climate official, Li Gao, argued that China should be exempt from emissions associated with its export sector. This comment, which was met with immediate skepticism, and the DRC’s framework indicate China’s intentions to go head-to-head on these issues.

While China finds ways to obscure the fact that it now tops the list in annual carbon dioxide emissions, other countries – including both industrialized countries and smaller developing countries – as well as climate scientists argue that a climate treaty without full and meaningful participation, in the form of mitigation, from China and the US, will fall short of adequately addressing climate concerns and averting more serious future consequences. The “right to develop” by carbon intensity standards set 100 years ago not only represents obsolete thinking, but poses a potentially very serious threat to all humanity.

If you like what you read here, check out Talk of Carbon Tariff Flatly Rejected by China, Prompts ‘Protectionist’ Charges.

Advertisements

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] CBDR is grounded in a concern for social equity, best explained in terms of examining (1) who are historically culpable for GHG emissions while giving consideration to (2) per capita emissions and (3) the relative […]

  2. […] CBDR is grounded in a concern for social equity, best explained in terms of examining (1) who are historically culpable for GHG emissions while giving consideration to (2) per capita emissions and (3) the relative […]

  3. […] that developed countries “lead the way” on emissions reductions and not block countries like China’s “right to development,” it is not unlikely that China will eventually adopt a more cooperative […]

  4. […] that developed countries “lead the way” on emissions reductions and not block countries like China’s “right to development,” it is not unlikely that China will eventually adopt a more cooperative […]


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: